While building's first collapse was not covered, there were disputed facts regarding the second collapse, leading to a reversal of the order granting summary judgment to the insurer on both collapses. Intergroup Int'l Ltd. v. Cincinnati Ins. Cos, 2017 Ohio app. LEXIS 5099 (Ohio Ct. App. Nov. 22, 2017). Intergroup bought a building after it was inspected. While leaks on the roof were repaired and a roof truss that was sagging was replaced, the inspector found the roof to be in good shape.
Construction Defect Journal Archives
No Coverage for Building's First Collapse, But Disputed Facts on Second Collapse
January 10, 2018
Tred R. Eyerly – Insurance Law Hawaii
- 1 of 208
- next ›